Untitled - Both in

Untitled

Both in

{ 05:10, 2009-Aug-13 } { Link }

Irrespective of where they have a rule as long as the sum of the value of unlimited, we can wage the same as talking about, when it comes to a net income. Because our only concern here is that a sustained flow of goods into the hands of individuals, and does not require him to continue to resell to others. The results have a limitless calculations do not exclude the possibility of such a flow of goods, it is a sign of the existence of commodity flow. In fact, it is understood to be below the theoretical interest of an essential element.
3. To avoid the dilemma of interest , as well as the second method. With regard to services in excess of the value of labor and land on the remainder of the permanent question of what is possible, can also be pointed out that the land and the value of labor service brake to answer this question. If this is the brake, then it will no doubt prove the possibility of permanent value of the remainder, and the possibility of such a situation, at least on the personal point of view, be attributed to the fullest the sense of the value of productivity. The value of productivity, or productivity includes the value of the goods, will have a net income. In each economy, there will be a special, independent of the value of the remainder. Then the interest will not be the true sense of the cost factor interest will be attributed to the existence of cost and product value or price differences between it will be more than the true remaining cost.
In an exchange economy, when the product is a monopoly, this situation occurs - here we have the monopoly of the original factors of production are not interested in, because the very beginning it was clear, the emergence and existence of the interest, it is not possible to the original factors of production as the basis of the monopoly. In fact, the monopoly of the same plays as the role of brakes, and to bring about a permanent monopoly of the net income. We have a monopoly as the net income gains, as we have the right and the same reasons, the same net income as rent. In this case, the sum rule would be the result of an infinite. At the same time, this situation will not lose that revenue and net income characteristics. As for why the monopoly value - for example, the value of a permanent monopoly of the patent - not unlimited, but it is not our concern here only come back later to answer. Finally, to determine the value of a monopoly is a special problem here, at the same time to solve this problem, we must not forget that small voice in the normal circulation cycle in which there was no formation of the value of such a monopoly of power Therefore, this should not be profitable linked to any other number. No matter how this all possible, a monopoly in any case and never has been said I do not want to make a profit, because I told me to give the monopoly of a very high value. This is no question about it.
Lauderdale in the discussion of interest theory, thealso commented on a labor-saving machines and generate a profit monopoly. He rightly stressed that this machine was used, we will definitely get high profit, or a slight profit, just enough to lure people to purchase or lease it. That39s for sure. However, no doubt profit is always associated with the production of machinery, and as lasting as the patent. People may say that the monopoly status of the monopoly, it is similar to something the factors of production. Mention of such a quasi-factors of production and service , just as other elements referred to as the ownership of the problem occurred. Machine itself is not a source of surplus value, means of production machinery is not the source of surplus value, but the existence of monopoly or the use of the machine the machine may be the means of production of surplus value. Obviously, if we let the machine producers and users of the same for a person, the results remain the same.
Therefore, we have encountered is a special kind of net income. If the so-called net income of such interest as the same, then everything will be true. The three problems we will be satisfied with the answer. Here contains a source of surplus value, and its existence will be explained by the theory of monopoly also will have a reason to a distribution of income to the monopolist Finally, whether vested or competition will not be the fact that the elimination of income , will be that. However, this is not the monopoly of a large number of rules and there, enough to make the interpretation of the above acceptable, and more, there is no such monopoly, there would still be of interest also.
Other people may be talking about a situation is that if the valuation of goods for the future is a systematic and in principle, lower than the current valuation of goods, then, labor and land services and the value of permanent value often falls behind situation, it will exist. Readers here already know will not accept this view, but we need to once again referred to this situation. It is precisely because in so far discussed the various cases, the only permanent source of income is from a permanent at least from the personal point of view is so and the production of services, where the case involves another a problem, that is, the value of the movement itself. Previously, such an interpretation is to determine the production of some special services and here, on the one hand, it is to determine the labor and land value, on the other hand is to determine the value of consumer goods. Here, from a monopoly case than in a more precise and moresense, on the value of products will occur over the remainder of the means of production value. And more than the cost of the remaining will be a matter of fact refers to a net income and more than has been produced by the means of production capital value remaining. Therefore, this will in fact prove that income will not disappear, nor will it process by calculating the absorption away. Because the value of future products is not the whole calculation of attribution and, if and when the ownership of means of production value to determine the action to be taken, then the next product will not be its actual value but in the smaller volume. In this way, people will no doubt prove the sustainability of the possibility of flow of goods, whether it is in real life is not what we observed in interest rates. This was answered the first question the interest to run out the value of the source will exist. The second issue, that is why the flow of such commodities, but into those specific to individual hands, it is clear it will be in it is not difficult to answer. The third issue, that is, why such income will not disappear, it is so far the question of interest in the most difficult part, but also will become unnecessary. Since the remaining value can also be non-attribution of reasons to explain why, then again to ask why it did not come with attribution methods meaningless.
Therefore, if only the passage of time has a paramount importance on the value of the impact, if reality tells us that time is not only a fact that has not yet been analyzed, but also rooted in the fact that the existence of interest, but interest from other reasons have to explained that this demonstration of the line, from itself, it is very satisfactory, are to make is in my view, it would put us into the economic process and the actual process that occurred in many conflict. From a purely logical sense, it would not be opposed. However, the passage of time, do not have such a unique impact on the most important. Even in the passage of time, the growth of many commodities has proved the value of nothing. Since this fact is particularly outstanding, but also in the subject in the literature played a certain role, then it might be to add a few notes.
There are two such values to increase. First, a commodity service - actual or potential - of the process in time can automatically changes the value of such goods will also increase. It is often cited example is the non-mature forests and keep the wine cellar. On these occasions, what exactly will happen? With the natural course of the passage of time, forests and wine do become more valuable. However, they only become a greater value of the material terms, but speaking from an economic value of this majoryoung and new on the wine already exists, because the value of growth is dependent on them. From the fact that we are already familiar with the position of point of view, these saplings and new wine, it should be the same for felling trees and Reserva, with the same value. Wood and wine before the full maturity could be sold to consumers, they will ask all the owners in every economic cycle, which will be a choice to make significant gains is the wait time to further mature trees and wine, or now and re-sell them on the cultivation and production. They would choose to have a greater practice revenue, and they will be from the very beginning of the corresponding trees and wine, as well as the need for labor and land services, evaluation. In practice, however, is not the case. Because with the trees and close to a mature wine, and their value will continue to grow. In spite of this, as we will soon see, this is due to return to their roots material and personal risk, in particular the risk of life In addition, interest attributable to the fact that already exists, under certain conditions so that the cost of time to become an important element. If it were not for these factors, there would be no increase this value. If people decided to extend the original mature forest and wine, it is only because people have been found more beneficial to do so. So there will be a new use of forest and methods of wine, which decided to adopt the new method, it is obviously a certain value can be increased. But over time, and first and foremost as a phenomenon unique to the passage of time, generally speaking, not a true value of the constant growth.
Secondly, a situation often occurs, it is a commodity service in the material is absolutely the same as before, but in the course of the passage of time there was an increase in its value. This can only be due to the emergence of a new demand, which is a development phenomenon. How people look at this situation is easy to understand. If there is no foreseeable increase in demand will have a profit, but it does not constitute a lasting increase in the value of a profit. Conversely, if the predicted increase in demand, then profits should be the beginning of the vesting in the relevant commodities, there is no value of such growth. If in real life the value of growth is still there, then we and material characteristics in order to improve the same way to explain it.
4. We have amay lead us to the issue of interest out of the dilemma of the thinking of the most important context, at the same time, the results have been negative. Therefore, we find that they have been forced to return repeatedly talked about the residual value of the issue, and we can have a clear conscience and the residual value of such amount as the net surplus, in other words, as products that reflect the value of more than in the production of products of the residual value of the commodity in places. The existence of the remaining amount is due to the environment of a particular value of the product to exceed the flow of goods in circulation in the value of the balance. For this purpose, net income and commodities as the source of the flow characteristics of the remaining amount, in fact, be considered and future on the value of goods was deliberately underestimated the case.
So that the value of means of production is higher than its value, so that through these means of production can reap profits in a growing economy can also happen. Errors and fortune, the accidental deviation from the expected results, the situation of distress and the rich more than occasionally - these and many other occasions, could have a surplus, but the reality that the value of the deviation from the normal value, and at the same time the means of production used the value of the deviation, is irrelevant. We will focus on the development of the kind arising as a result of the residual value, which is much more interesting. We have them divided into two main parts the first part, including those brought about by the development of the residual value, in a sense, the development is to create a residual value of these and the remaining amount can select products from the new and more beneficial to be explained by the use of these products is the value of the past by the use of other less favorable to the decision. Including those based on the second part of the remainder of the development of response, which is based on the development brought about by the demand for certain goods in the actual or anticipated growth.
Again, as will be recognized, the residual value of all of these can be imagined in any true sense of the actual amount of the surplus without having to worry about in the calculation or caught in a dilemma between the cost of form position. In wages, rents and monopoly in any other income other than personal names into the hands of all the goods flow, directly or indirectly, must come from the residual value of these. However, let us recall the proposition has been derived, it is the law of competition and the role of valuation in general tend to cost more than the elimination of all remaining places. For example, if an enterprise to a sudden and unexpected need for some kind of machine, this machine will increase the value, the owner of this machine will definitely be in whole or in part to obtain the residual value. However, if people have already anticipated this new demand, then the idea will certainly be more such machines have been produced and are now competing producers from the supply to the market. At this time, or the profits of the special can not be achieved, or, if production can not expand, and the remaining amount will vest in the natural and the original factors of production and, in accordance with the rules of well-known of all the Lord delivered them to the hands. Even if the new requirements did not expect that the economy will eventually adapt itself to such a demand, then also there will be no residual value of a permanent contact with the machine together.
5. We can now systematically expounded the theory of our interest in five propositions, which is almost five propositions automatically from the first basic conclusion that the phenomenon of interest is a kind of value is the price of a factor in this regard, we are and interest of any scientific theory is consistent, then the proposition by the Sixth Road to complete the theory.
First, the interest stems largely from just an inspection tour of the residual value. Since in the normal process of economic life there are no other remaining, and that interest does not arise from something else. Of course, this only applies to what we call the production of narrow interest, and does not apply to consumer - the production of sexual interest. Interest only as long as wages and rents above the parasite, then, it is clear that the residual value of it and these are not directly related. However, the capitalist class of a large number of survival, there are rules of the commodity flow, which in each economic period Income from production into the capitalist class in the hands of - the flow of goods can only come from our residual value. These points, and then left behind to be examined more carefully. dolce e gabbana Furthermore, there is still a residual value of nature, that is, monopoly earnings. Therefore, we assume that the proposition is not a typical source of interest income is a monopoly. But this, as I have already mentioned, it should be clear enough. In this way, if there is no development, under the above conditions there would be no interest interest is the development of the economic value of the oceans by huge waves whipped up a part of. First of all, our proposition is based on the value of the cycle of circulation in the decision to exclude the phenomenon of interest in this evidence to the contrary. And this evidence to the contrary, first of all, how is the value of our direct understanding of decision-making process, followed by an attempt based on a variety of flimsy, did not want a development in the economy, the value of established products and between means of production value a decisive difference. Then we prove that from the front, the value of the difference in the development process does exist. This proposition in the course of the discussion below, gradually it is not strange. However, you can immediately emphasize that this proposition does not like at first glance as far away from our reality, non-biased, because industrial development is of interest, at least form the main source of income.
Second, as we have seen, and the development of the residual value is divided into two categories profits and entrepreneurs on behalf of the development of response to those values. Obviously of interest can not fall into the latter category. We can so easily concluded that because the remainder of the process of creating this is very clear. In this connection, we can immediately understand what one no. Let us take as an example of a businessman, as he opened the store near a number of factories, he will be a temporary income greater than the balance of income. So he would get a certain profit. This profit is not of interest, because it is not permanent, but will soon disappear as a result of competition. However, interest does not flow from the profit out of this - the assumption that businessmen in the profit did not do anything, and just stand on the shop store to obtain higher prices for customers - no longer because of this profit what will never change traders dolce gabbana only into the pockets of it, want to spend it. This whole process did not leave room for the phenomenon of interest. Therefore, interest is bound to flow profits from the entrepreneurs. This is an indirect conclusion, of course, with the support of this theory compared to other facts, I can only think that this conclusion with the importance of the second. Thus, in one way or another, the development of part of profits to go to the capitalists. Interest to become a tax on the profits.

{ Last Page } { Page 56 of 62 } { Next Page }

Untitled

Both in

About Me

Links

Categories

Recent Entries

Friends